新西兰计算机科学论文代写：网络管理
有很多优点，包括协调组织内学习提高网络资源的有效利用，使规划容量的增加，以及解决高度复杂的问题和增强竞争力和即兴服务基于客户。这个观点得到了阿格拉诺夫和麦奎尔2001检查，重视对治理的主要活动。根据这一观点，网络管理必须放在重要场所检查管理公共领域及其管理（通过et al.，2010A）。
考虑到这一想法的作者，有人认为，管理所扮演的角色是至关重要的网络的有效成果。在特定的意义上说，管理层的努力可以检查工作按照项目建设支持的一个相互依存的情况下，在吸引合作伙伴和克服挑战的努力，被所有的演员提出包括（通过et al.，2010b）。为了分析网络管理对网络结果的影响，理解网络的定义是非常重要的。网络被称为三或更多的依法自治的公司一起工作不仅是他们的个人目标和实现目标的群体，而且目标设定集体（lenferink et al.，2013）。这是通过创建一个集中在那些有助于发展政策的网络，并转化为行动。建立这些网络已经完成了一个特定的目的，通过参与网络内的人，或者一个任务，和发展主要通过有意识地努力加强协调。
它已经被Klijn（2010b）的主要论点是，在管理网络足够的策略的情况下，它变得非常困难，有时是不可能的，因为在这些高度复杂的网络的有趣的结果（通过et al.，2010b）。假设是一个令人满意的结果往往是不可能的，没有网络管理。然而，在网络管理的文献中，存在着一些理论上的质疑，而不是逻辑上的实证研究。因此，这是一个具有测量网络的性能和结果的能力需要（李晓华，2013）。除此之外，根据网络上的文献，在网络中的信任，以及检查。然而，它已被确定，这一行的研究被应用到公共管理。
新西兰计算机科学论文代写：网络管理
There are a number of advantages to coordinate network that includes enhancement of learning within the organization, efficient utilization of resource, increase in capacity to make planning, and the to address the highly complex issues with enhancement of competitiveness and improvising services based on client. This particular view has been examined by Agranoff and McGuire 2001, by laying emphasis over the main activity of governance. According to this view, management of network must be placed as an important arena to examine the fields for management of public as well as its administration (Klijn et al., 2010a).
Considering this idea of the authors, it has been argued that the role played by management is crucial for the effective outcomes of network. In the specific sense, the efforts of management can be examined for working in accordance with an interdependent scenario for building support for the programs, attracting partners in the endeavours of cooperation, and overcoming the challenges being presented by all of the actors involve (Klijn et al., 2010b). For analysing the effect of network management over the outcomes of network, it is important to understand the definition of network, accordingly. Networks have been referred to as groups of three or more lawfully autonomous companies working together for the achievement of not only their individual objectives and goals, but also the goals and objectives set collectively (Lenferink et al., 2013). This is done by creating a focus over those networks that help in the development of policies, and conversion of them into actions. The setting up of these networks has been done with a particular purpose, either by the ones participating within the network, or by a mandate, and evolving majorly by the consciously made efforts in the enhancement of coordination.
It has been recalled by Klijn (2010b) that the main argument is that in the absence of adequate strategies for management of network, it becomes extremely difficult, or at times impossible, for the achievement of interesting results in all of these highly complex network (Klijn et al., 2010b). The assumption made is that an outcome that is satisfactory is often impossible without the management of network. However, in the literature of network management, there are a number of theoretical queries rather than the logical empirical research. Therefore, there is a need for having the ability of measuring the performance and outcomes of network (Considine, 2013). In addition to this, as per the literature on network, trust in the network has to be examined as well. However, it has been identified that this line of research is being applied to the administration of public.
