新西兰维特利亚社区理工学院论文代写：美国邮政业务
它也注意到，公共部门的组织必须公开承诺相比，他们的内部治理和运营标准的依赖更重要（（Hill和琼斯，2012），这已被证明是无效的情况下，美国邮政。即使是公共部门的组织有责任负责自己的经营行为，不能简单地归咎于政府的失败（Haberberg和rieple，2008；环和Perry，1985）。因此，美国邮政的行动不提高其价格在需要的时候，没法留住员工时，应该避免未来的缺口。他们还没有一个前瞻性的管理来预测未来的问题和在它们到来之前已经准备好的解决方案，利用现有的资源和恶劣的标准化服务质量。这些都导致了身份的陷阱，它落在了进一步升级的来自政府的限制，调整成本超支补贴非征收一致。
三.被诊断为失败的第三个问题是关于削减成本导致大规模裁员的不明智的决定，当需求上升时，他们会受到伤害.。这是行不通的，一个组织不考虑员工资产（巫师和洲，2010；汤普森和马丁，2010；赫西，1998），和美国邮政是不是其中之一因为它下岗多员工削减成本的主要原因。这个特殊的问题可以归因于资本市场状况的不平衡，因为零星的上升和下降的需求是一个关键事件，调整组织成本，特别是固定成本从工人的工资（哈里森和圣约翰，2004）。当资本市场条件不如浮动利率稳定，股票市场的波动，通货膨胀率，等，是明智的战略转移向稳定的驱动和维持服务质量和抑制成本（Choo和Bontis，2002）。无法组织来调整自己的需求和工人的工资成本，这些事件往往是由管理层决定市场趋势预测引起的，保持低成本供应商的管理效率，并提高价格逐渐维持竞争（Freeman，2010）。
新西兰维特利亚社区理工学院论文代写：美国邮政业务
It is also noticed that the public sector organisations must make public commitments more important compared to the dependence on their in-house standards of governance and operations ((Hill and Jones, 2012), which has been proven to be ineffective in case of USPS. Even public sector organisations are liable to be responsible for their business conduct and not simply blame the governing authority for its failure (Haberberg and Rieple, 2008; Ring and Perry, 1985). Thus, USPS did not act in increasing their prices when needed, did not act in retaining employees when it should have to avoid future shortfall. They also did not have a foresighted management to foresee future problems and have ready solutions before theyarrive, and were poor in using existing resources to standardise the service quality. These all led to the identity trap that it fell in which was further escalated by the restrictions from the government, non-imposition of consistent subsidies for adjusting the cost overruns.
3. The third issue that was diagnosed for its failure is the ill-informed decisions made about cost cutting leading to massive lay-offs which hurt them when the demand rose. This is impracticable that an organisation does not consider their employees as their assets (Witcher and Chau, 2010; Thompson and Martin, 2010; Hussey, 1998), and USPS was not one of them as it laid off multiple employees for the primary reason of cost cutting. This particular issue can be attributed to the imbalances in the capital market conditions as the sporadic rise and fall of demand is a critical event for adjusting an organisations cost, especially the fixed cost emerging from the worker salaries (Harrison and St. John, 2004). When the capital market conditions are not stable such as fluctuating interest rates, stock market volatility, and inflation rates, etc., it is wiser to shift the strategy towards a stabilisation drive and maintain the service quality and suppression of costs (Choo and Bontis, 2002). The inability of organisations to adjust themselves in such incidences of demand and cost of worker salaries is often caused by the management’s decision to foresee the market trend, keep their cost low with efficient vendor management, and raise prices gradually to sustain competition (Freeman, 2010).
