英国艺术与设计论文代写：艺术中的童年
敬爱的母亲就是邓肯所作的这样一幅画像。这里有一家家庭会客厅。慈爱的母亲被孩子们包围着。有许多孩子围绕母亲和母亲作为一个幸福在这里介绍。丈夫也在场，孩子的保姆也一样。的想法，是在这里提出的是，享受母亲和父亲和一个幸福的联盟。一种美德被颂扬的美德，是不是新的，它倡导的是幸福的。画像里有许多孩子，但他们在画像中没有声音。邓肯援引狄德罗的话说，“这幅画对所有情感和情感的人说：”让你的家人舒适；给你妻子尽可能多的孩子，并确保在家里快乐。儿童本质上是一个幸福家庭的需要。狄德罗为父亲创造了一些意义，对于那些被许多孩子包围的母亲来说是有意义的，但这幅画却没有为孩子们提供一个讨论的背景。孩子是无声的。
同样地考虑上面的图片。在这里，它是一个家庭的代表。有母亲和父亲坐在桌子旁边，一只狗站在他们的脚边。有孩子站在他们周围，有些坐下来，整个代表是相当阴沉的。这张照片是一个家庭组的照片。然而，即使孩子们在这张照片中看到的大多数数字，占主导地位的声音是父亲的声音。坐在照片右边的老父亲和妻子是主要的因素。有女儿、女婿或儿子，还有其他孩子。然而，声音是一个父亲，谁可能有最有意愿和权力的家庭。在第一张照片中，孩子们都是婴儿，这里的孩子稍大一些。第一幅图画可以论证孩子们是婴儿，因此缺乏声音。然而，在第二幅图中，虽然孩子们是不同年龄段的，但他们只被认为是一个群体的一部分，仍然缺乏个人的声音背景。绘画似乎围绕在丈夫/父亲忽略孩子的话语权。
英国艺术与设计论文代写：艺术中的童年
The Beloved mother is one such portrait presented by Duncan. Here a family parlor is presented. The loving mother is surrounded by children. There are many children surrounding the mother and motherhood as a felicity is presented here. The husband is also present as so is a nanny for the children. The idea that is presented here is that of enjoying motherhood and fatherhood and a blissful union. A virtue is being extolled here, the virtue is nothing new, it is something that is advocated for as being blissful. There are many children in the portrait; however they don’t have a voice in the portrait. Duncan cites Diderot as having said of this painting that “It says to all men of feeling and sensibility: ‘Keep your family comfortable; give [your wife] as many children as you can and be assured of being happy at home’. Children in essence are presented as the needs for a happy family. There are meaning created for the father as Diderot presents, there are meanings created for the mother who is said to be happy when surrounded by her many children, but the picture lacks to present a context of discussion for the child. The child is voiceless.
Similarly consider the picture above. Here it is the representation of the household of a family. There are mother and father sitting down at the table, a dog at their feet. There are children standing around them, and some sitting down, the whole representation is quite somber. The very picture is that of a family group. However, even with the children being the majority of numbers seen in this picture, the dominant voice is that of the father. The old father and the wife who are seated on the right of the picture are the dominant elements. There are daughters, son-in-law’s or sons, and other children. Yet the voice is that of a father who probably has the most will and power in the family. In the first picture where the children were babies, here the children are slightly older. It could be argued in the first picture that the children were babies and hence lack a voice. However here in the second picture although the children are of various age groups, they are only considered as part of a group and still lack the individual context of voice. The paining seemingly revolves on the dominant voice of the husband/ father figure ignoring the children.
