澳洲军事学论文代写:国际刑事法院
关于起诉非洲国家的争论无疑是国际刑事法院面临的最大挑战之一。大部分被国际刑事法院解决的案件目前正在犯罪，正在非洲国家承诺相关（Bassiouni，1997）。这无疑对国际刑法的透明度和问责提出了一些严重的怀疑。出于这个原因，保护责任的概念已经推出了国际法和外交专家。“保护的责任”可以被定义为一个 规范提出 ， 强调主权 不仅仅是个人和国家的许多 绝对权利 也失去主权的各个方面，每当他们失败的保护公民免遭悲剧和暴行有关犯罪的某些行为，有时侵犯人权（贝拉米，2011）。虽然责任起诉仅仅是一个规范和不规则或法律，这种规范的支持者们表示，这主要是基于 国际法的核心环节，坚持其基本原则。
多年来，非洲联盟的组件通常采用各种技术和决议都倾向于批判的ICC和他们的方法（布鲁姆霍尔，2003）。出于这个原因，本文将讨论一些最重要的原因，将表达的挫折，非洲联盟对国际刑事法院。本研究 核心重点探讨“保护的责任”，并将其与具有国际刑事法院的非洲国家的坎坷挫折（ICC）。本研究将提出的一些关键问题是：
如何重要的是有责任保护非洲的框架？
多金的态度已经改变了对过去几年的ICC？
有ICC的国际关系，涉及国家豁免的头的学说的影响，在一定程度上，利比亚和叙利亚的起诉已经提出了一些关于国际刑事法院的控制和授权，在国际刑事法院起诉的过程和规律？
国际刑事法院是否可以推定有罪在非洲一些重要案件的起诉吗？
有以解决国际犯罪和纠纷的一个区域或大陆法院建立非洲联盟有什么企图？
这项研究将总结与未来的前景，互惠和国际刑事法院之间的关系，是否会有任何联系，国际刑事法院和非盟。
澳洲军事学论文代写:国际刑事法院
The debate regarding prosecutions of African state has certainly been one of the biggest challenges ever faced by the International Criminal Court (ICC). Most of the cases that are being solved by the ICC are currently are related to crimes that are being committed in African countries (Bassiouni, 1997). This has certainly raised some serious doubts regarding the transparency and accountability of international criminal law. For this reason, the concept of responsibility to protect has been introduced by experts on international law and diplomacy. The Responsibility to protect can be defined as a proposed norm that asserts the fact that sovereignty is not merely an absolute right of individuals and many states also forfeit various aspects of their sovereignty whenever they fail for protecting their citizens from travesties and atrocities regarding crimes and certain acts that sometimes violate human rights (Bellamy, 2011). Although Responsibility to prosecute is merely a norm and not a regulation or law, the proponents of this norm have stated that it is based primarily on the core aspects of International law and adheres to its basic principles.
Over the years, the assembly of the African Union has often adopted various techniques and resolutions that have tend to be critical of ICC and their approach (Broomhall, 2003). For this reason, the paper will discuss some of the most important reasons that will express the frustrations of the African Union towards ICC. The core emphasis of the study is to evaluate the concept of “Responsibility to Protect” and to integrate it with the frustration of the African states frustrations with the International Criminal Court (ICC). Some of the key questions that will be raised in this research are:
How importance is the framework of Responsibility to Protect for Africa?
How the attitude of AU has changed towards the ICC over the past few years?
How has the ICC been affected by the doctrine of the international relations that relates to the head-of-state immunity, the extent to which prosecutions in Libya and Syria have raised questions regarding the ICC’s control and authorization, the process and regulations of prosecution within the ICC?
Whether the ICC can be presumed guilty of prosecution of some important cases in Africa?
Has there been any attempt by the African Union regarding establishment of a regional or continental court for resolving international crimes and disputes?
The study will be concluded with the future prospects of the relationship between AU and ICC and whether there will be any liaison between ICC and AU.
