assignment first:虚假招收学生的案例讨论

assignment first:虚假招收学生的案例讨论

该公司通过一份声明表示,其部分挨家挨户的中介存在不合理行为,向学生虚假陈述信息。他们在招收学生时,并不知道课程结束后他们将承担偿还债务的负担。代理人的虚假陈述包括工作承诺、免费研讨会、高薪等。这些甜头被用来使交易不可抗拒的学生更有可能受到这样的影响。令人惊讶的是,登记在册的学生名单中还有80名来自落后社区的土著学生,他们试图进入澳大利亚主流社会赚钱。


assignment first :虚假招收学生的案例讨论

许多学生还获得了ipad和手机等形式的额外津贴来注册这门课程。因此,入学人数急剧增加,反映了学生人数的良好增长。并不是所有的注册学生都真正上过这门课,但即使是这些表格也被认为是有资格申请学生贷款的,因此从政府获得的资金超过了实际需求。据说,这样的行为已经永久性地损害了该公司的形象和市场价值,而当受害者是寻求在政府支持下自学的无辜学生时,伤害更大。该公司承认存在不当行为,并将责任归咎于提供错误课程信息的走户中介,以及通过虚假承诺骗取学生入学的做法。这导致了发现和实际需要贷款的学生之间的巨大差距。该公司最近宣布,它已与法院签订了一份可强制执行的合同,将从政府获得的所有从未用于或打算用于学生债务的资金返还给法院。自那以后,该公司已向ACCC支付了4,430万美元,如果在继续调查中出现一些超支,该公司可能会支付更多。在另一份声明中,该公司还表示,已向政府偿还1.6亿美元。这些资金没有用于学生贷款。


assignment first :虚假招收学生的案例讨论

The company through an announcement stated that some of its door to door agent was involved in unconscionable conduct, by misrepresenting the information to students. They were enrolling students without their knowledge that they were to receive the burden of the debt repayment when the course finishes. The misrepresentation of agents involved promises of jobs, free seminars, big salaries, etc. These sweeteners were used to make the deal irresistible Students are more likely to come under such influence. Surprisingly, the enrolled students list also contained 80 Aboriginal students from a backward community who were trying to come into mainstream Australia to make money.


assignment first :虚假招收学生的案例讨论

Many students also received perks in the form of iPads and phones to enrol in the course. Thus the number of enrolments went up drastically, reflecting a good growth of student enrolment. Not all who enrolled actually took the course in class, but even those forms were considered as eligible for student debt, thus receiving more funds from the government than the actual requirement or need. Such an act has been said to have put a permanent dent on the company’s image and market value, and it hurts more when the victims are innocent students who are seeking to educate themselves with the governments support. The company admitted to the wrongdoing and put the blame on the contracted door to door agents who were providing wrong information about the course and duping students to enrol in the course by offering false promises. This led to a large gap of finding and the actual students who needed loan. The company recently made an announcement that it has entered into a court enforceable contract to give back all the money received from the government that was never used or meant to be used for student debts. The company since then has paid to the ACCC an amount of $44.3 million dollar, and may even pay more if there arises some overcharges in the continued investigation. In another announcement, it also states that $160 million dollar has been repaid back to the government. These funds were not used for student debts.

相关的论文代写的话题