财产权利

新出生的标题给完美的自由和无限享受的权利和特权的自然定律,认为每个人相等和加入社会与其他男性权力集团由于自然的保护他的财产,包括他的生命,自由和财产从尝试和伤害别人。这些罪行的惩罚,因为任何政治社会可以生存没有力量来保护财产和抑制那些罪行。政治社会因此存在每个人的集团已放弃自然权利和提交给立法法律,在社区的手(骆家辉,Ch 7,68页)。
骆家辉的第二篇论文的前提是基于自由社会每个人平等的自然权利。他们将获得商品和做他们请,但卢梭是另一个著名的社会契约的思想家是谁怀疑这个事实。他认为,一个人在自然状态仅仅是“愚蠢的、有限的动物”是由本能驱使和奴役(卢梭,27页)。
根据洛克,当人们开始拥有和拥有货物,出现冲突,人们攻击财产增加的威胁。洛克假定需要政治体制保护社会成员的财产。洛克认为,应该有一个低道德的人最好的保护自己的生命和财产安全,必须在一起,形成一个统一的身体和坚持通常可接受的行为,从而提交他们的自然权利进入社会契约(骆家辉,Ch 8,49页)。专注于卢梭的社会契约论的时候,一个人当提交他的自然自由,往往倾向于无限的权利和实践积累,他可以。但放弃他的自然的自由,他挣的专有所有权,他拥有(卢梭,27页),否则会被地球上所有人类的属性。
财产权利
A new born is given the title to perfect freedom and an unlimited enjoyment of rights and privileges of the law of nature; deeming each human being equal to each other and joining society with other men in the group due to the nature of power to protect his property including his life, freedom and estate from attempts and injuries from other men. These crimes are punished and because no political society can subsist without a power to protect that property and restraining those crimes. A political society thus exists where every man in the group has given up his natural right and submitted to the legislative laws, in to the hands of the community (Locke, Ch 7, p 68).
Locke’s Second Treatise is based on the premise of free society with equal natural rights for each individual. They will acquire goods and do as they please but Rousseau who is another famous social contract thinker is sceptical of this fact. He believes that an individual in state of nature is mere a ‘stupid, limited animal’ who is driven and enslaved by instincts (Rousseau, p 27).
When, according to Locke, people start possessing and owning goods, conflicts arise, the threat of people attacking the property increases. Locke presumes that a political system is required to protect the property of members in the society. Locke believes that there should be a low of morality within the people to best protect their lives and property and must come together to form a united body and adhere to normally acceptable behaviours, thereby submitting some of their natural rights to enter in to social contract (Locke, Ch 8, p 49). While focusing on the Rousseau’s social contract, a person when submits his natural liberty, is often tempted to practice unlimited rights and accumulate all that he can. But by giving up his natural freedom, he earns the proprietary ownership of all that he owns (Rousseau, p 27), otherwise it would have been a property of all mankind on earth.