本篇代写价格-公司实体的限制和障碍讲了公司必须面对的主要限制之一是，这些实体必须面对与劳动分工和权利有关的问题。这一问题的一个例子可以由国际法院在非常著名的巴塞罗那牵引案中以较好的方式加以解释。在本案中，法院还认为，公司的国籍应由公司成立地决定。股东的国籍虽然是存在的，但由于其所具有的性质，实际上是可以确定的。目前有许多国际法法庭越来越愿意无视公司公司，而偏袒股东及其国籍。审裁处亦表示，股东有权提出申索，因为保护与股东有关的实际权益很重要。本篇代写价格文章由新西兰第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Limits and barriers in corporate entity
One of the major limitations which has to be faced by the corporate is that these entities have to face the issues which are related to the division of labours and the rights. An example of this problem can be explained in a better manner by the International Court of Justice in the very famous case of Barcelona Traction. In this case, the court also held that there should be the determination of the nationality of the company by the place of incorporation. Though the nationality which is there with the shareholders, it can be actually determined because of the nature possessed by the entity. There are many international law tribunals in the present times which have been more and more willing to disregard the corporate firm in the favour of the shareholders and their nationality. The tribunal for this case also stated that the shareholders have the right to bring the claim as it is important to have the protection of real interest which may be related to the share holders. (Tricker, 2015).
Another limitations faced by the corporate entity is that there is a huge diversity of the firms. This can prove to be a problematic situation in a number of other conditions. This can be a limitation in case of the insurance. Taking Macaura v Northern Assurance Co. Ltd as an example, Macaura sold the land and the timber to the company “Macaura v Northern Assurance Co. “. The timber was destroyed by the fire which was there in the timber company. Macaura earlier had also insured a time against loss by fire on his own name. Also, he didn’t transfer the benefits to the company. When Macaura made a claim for the fire, the insurers of the company actually refused to pay the money. They raised the argument that he didn’t have any kind of insurable interest in the timber. The House of Lords also agreed that the insurers were not liable. Thus, the company had to face a huge loss. This was a major limitation which the company had to face.
Thus corporations in the present times are important parts of businesses. Currently, there are thousands of corporations in the world which have a number of corporate entities. It is important to understand the important things which may be related to any corporate entity. After the proliferation of the laws in 20th century, there has been creation of the corporations in different parts of the world. The corporations are getting more and more weight at present and therefore it is very important to understand the economic perspectives of the corporations. In this research paper, the discussion has been done on the corporate entities. In order to understand the same, different corporate entities have been considered and analysed. The principle of corporate entities has been understood through the Salomon’s case. Further, there has been a discussion on the statement “ Corporate entity works likes a boomerang and hits the man who was trying to use it” through the examples of Salomon’s. Besides, there has been a complete understanding related to the different kinds of the corporate entities which may be there under the operation. Moreover, the limits and the boundaries related to the corporations have also been understood and analysed. Thus, the report gives the viable information related to the corporate entities and the different perspectives associated with the different corporate entities.