代写论文:有关实验研究目的、方法、结论的简述

代写论文:有关实验研究目的、方法、结论的简述

简述本研究的目的

研究摘要表明,人们无法从第一眼到第二一眼的视觉印象中检测到变化,这意味着当人们从一种视角到第二种视角看待环境时,他们无法检测到视觉变化和细节。本研究基于对视觉图像变化检测背后的原因进行研究。本研究是在各种实验的基础上进行的,结果也包括在内。

简要说明方法,并说明是否适当。

研究方法是通过不同的现实世界实验来进行的。通过第一个实验,研究人员秘密地用一个人代替另一个人。这是在现实世界的互动和行动中进行的。第一个实验的方法包括15名行人作为研究对象,年龄在20到65岁之间。实验中,以行人为研究对象。他们要么一个人走,要么和别人一起走。

该方法是正确的,因为它提供了讨论的结果。结果表明,15名行人中有7人能够察觉到变化。实验者的穿着、声音和外表都有差异,只有7个人能察觉到这种变化。这也说明了变化盲的原因是中介刺激的被动性,因此它是在真实世界的变化可以被检测到的时候。

该研究还陈述了另一项实验,该实验是为了了解社会群体及其成员在检测变化中的作用。实验以同样的方法进行,只有一个关键的变化。这个变化是相同的实验者穿着和建筑工人一样的衣服,但是他们的衣服不同。实验者要求行人根据他们的地图提供建筑物的方向。

实验地点与实验1相同。共有12名行人参与了这个实验。在实验1中,年轻的参与者已经注意到了这种变化,而在第二个实验中,12名参与者中;只有四名参与者能够察觉到这种变化。

简要概述研究人员的结论,并讨论研究结果是否支持这些结论。

本研究中这些简单的实验是基于不同理论的研究和发现,如Loftus提出的目击者识别失败理论,Barlett的记忆扭曲理论,Pashler, Phillips和Simons最近提出的变化盲的研究。不同的研究表明,人类无法察觉运动或现实世界事件中的变化。两个不同的实验包括受试者,他们是行人,对情况一无所知。

因此,实验得出的结论是,人们无法注意到场景中任何中心对象的变化,即使这种变化发生在正在进行的真实世界事件的中间。仅仅注意到变化是不够的。另一个可能的反对意见是,行人的任务是提供方向,因此这种情况分散了他们的注意力,无法集中在变化上。实验对象主要集中在地图上,而不是实验者身上。

可以说,实验结果并没有根据实际情况给出具体的结果。研究对象主要集中在谈话上,并有轻微的眼神交流。行人察觉不到这种变化并不奇怪,因为它发生在正在进行的情景中,因为这种变化发生在不同的视图之间。


代写论文 :有关实验研究目的、方法、结论的简述

The abstract of the study suggests that people are not able to detect the changes from the visual impression from first look to second look, which means that when people look at the environment from one view to second view, they are not able to detect visual changes and details. The research is based on finding the reasons behind detecting the changes in visual images. The research is based on various experiments and results have also been included.
Briefly describe the methodology and indicate whether or not it was appropriate.
The methodology of the study is carried out through different real world experiments. Through first experiment the researchers surreptitiously substitute one person for another. This was carried out in the real world interaction and middle of the action. The method of the first experiment included 15 pedestrians as the subjects, who were between the ages of 20 to 65. For the experiment, pedestrians were used as the subject. These were either walking alone or with someone.
The methodology was correct as it provided the results with discussion. The result stated that seven out of fifteen pedestrians were able to detect change. There were difference in clothing, voice and appearance of the experimenter, only seven could detect that change. This also staes the reason behind change blindness is the passive nature of the mediated stimuli, thus it is when the real world changes could be detected.
The study also states another experiment, which was done in order to understand the role of social groups and their members in detecting the change. The experiment was carried out in the same way with one critical change. This change was that same experimenters were dressed as the construction workers, but their clothes were different. The experimenters asked the pedestrians to provide the directions of the building according to their map.
The experiment was conducted at the same location as the experiment 1. There were 12 pedestrians, who participated in this experiment. In the experiment 1 the younger participants had noticed the change, while in the second experiment out of twelve participants; only four participants could detect the change.
Briefly outline the researchers’ conclusions and discuss whether they were supported by the results of the study.
These simple experiment in the study are based on the research and findings of different theories such as, failures eyewitness identification proposed by Loftus, Barlett’s theory of distortion in memory and recent studies of change blindness proposed by Pashler, Phillips and Simons. Different studies show that humans are not able to detect change in the motion or in the real world incident. Two different experiments included the subjects, who were the pedestrians and did not have any idea about the situation.
Thus the experiments concludes that people could not notice that change to any central object within a scene, even if the change occurs immediately in the middle of the ongoing real world event. Attention is not enough to detect changes. Another possible objection is that the pedestrians were given the task of providing directions, thus this situation distracted their mind from concentrating on the change. The subjects in the experiments were mainly focused on the map rather than on experimenters.
It could be said that results of the experiments do not provide specific result according to the situation. The subjects were mainly focused on the conversation and were slightly making eye contact. There was no surprise that pedestrians could not detect the change because it happened among the ongoing situation because such changes occurred between different views.

相关的论文代写的话题