III – Basic Premises of Material Culture Approach
Ian Woodward introduced two different approaches to study material culture. With the help of many illustrations case studies such as of Helen (Focus on the conventional chair as an object) or Sarah (Focus on her faith through the bible as an object), it became evident that material culture has important implications on individuals lives. Following are the two approaches to the basic premises:
Inter-disciplinary and Cross-disciplinary inquiry;
This approach makes use of the multiple disciplines in providing explanation towards material culture rather than providing importance to just one authority. It takes into consideration the historical, sociological, anthropological, and psychological perspectives into complementing the various elements of material culture. Instead of just focusing on a single discipline, this approach makes use of each authority to illustrate and explain material culture in order to augment the imminent of each other. This is central because it is inevitable that an object has a solitary explanation. They are often described as “polysemous”, and objects are proficient of alteration of connotation over time and space contexts (Bateson, 2003). Moreover, there is an intrinsic variety of logical methodologies organized contained in numerous material culture studies, which generally assort from official structuralism and semiotic explanations, to ethnography, dialogue and observational studies. The cross-disciplinary environment of material culture explores the source that separate researches of material culture that commence transversely into multiple disciplines, however, do not essentially apply of interdisciplinary advances. The preventive and elite focal point of this approach of investigation means that one normally does not allocate orientation to significant sociological or anthropological customs in it, constant to those one might consider being amongst the majority significant and powerful.