代写thesis

III – Basic Premises of Material Culture Approach

Ian Woodward introduced two different approaches to study material culture. With the help of many illustrations case studies such as of Helen (Focus on the conventional chair as an object) or Sarah (Focus on her faith through the bible as an object), it became evident that material culture has important implications on individuals lives. Following are the two approaches to the basic premises:

Inter-disciplinary and Cross-disciplinary inquiry;

This approach makes use of the multiple disciplines in providing explanation towards material culture rather than providing importance to just one authority. It takes into consideration the historical, sociological, anthropological, and psychological perspectives into complementing the various elements of material culture. Instead of just focusing on a single discipline, this approach makes use of each authority to illustrate and explain material culture in order to augment the imminent of each other. This is central because it is inevitable that an object has a solitary explanation. They are often described as “polysemous”, and objects are proficient of alteration of connotation over time and space contexts (Bateson, 2003). Moreover, there is an intrinsic variety of logical methodologies organized contained in numerous material culture studies, which generally assort from official structuralism and semiotic explanations, to ethnography, dialogue and observational studies. The cross-disciplinary environment of material culture explores the source that separate researches of material culture that commence transversely into multiple disciplines, however, do not essentially apply of interdisciplinary advances. The preventive and elite focal point of this approach of investigation means that one normally does not allocate orientation to significant sociological or anthropological customs in it, constant to those one might consider being amongst the majority significant and powerful.

代写thesis

三,物质文化的方法的基本前提

伊恩Woodward方法研究物质文化两种不同的方法。与许多插图的案例研究,如海伦的帮助(侧重于传统的椅子作为一个对象)或莎拉(集中在她的信仰通过圣经作为一个对象),很明显,物质文化对个人生活的重要意义。下面是两种方法的基本前提:

跨学科和跨学科研究;

该方法提供的解释对物质文化而不是仅仅一个权威提供多学科使用的重要性。它考虑到了历史,社会学,人类学,心理学角度为补充的各种物质文化要素。而不是只专注于一个单一的学科,该方法利用每个权限说明和解释物质文化以增强彼此的来临。这是因为,一个对象有一个孤独的解释,这是不可避免的。他们通常被描述为“多义”,对象是精通变更内涵在时间和空间的上下文(贝特森,2003)。此外,有逻辑的方法固有的各种组织中大量的物质文化的研究,一般从结构主义和符号进行官方的解释,以民族志,对话和观察性研究。物质文化的交叉学科环境探源,物质文化,从横向到多学科的知识,但独立的研究,基本上不适用于跨学科的进展。预防和精英的这种方法研究的重点是通常不分配取向的社会学和人类学的重要习俗,不断的那些人可能会考虑在大多数重要的和强大的。

相关的论文代写的话题