代写网站：丑闻批判分析
从这两家在不同国家经营的银行的案例研究中可以看出，每个国家都有一个具有适当规则的监管框架。这些问题出现在实际的监管实践中。该公司的变化被发现是监管制裁和法律的执行。向监管机构提供法律保护，以确保公司的流程和安全网安排具有财务完整性。这些是用来解决实现缺陷的。这些监管机构采取了许多措施来防止欺诈行为。然而，尽管监管机构对这些问题进行了监控，但可以理解的是，这些问题会在后期被扣除。有系统的监测问题和缺乏明确的规则。许多公司想方设法规避法律，制定自己的销售目标。有必要对这些国家和法律采取更实际和更明确的办法。这些公司的标准制定者被发现有监管标准。这些监管委员会对待类似问题的方式有所不同，这加大了公司合规的难度。
这些法律仍然含糊不清，导致人们被规避。在这种模式下，公司需要有道德的行为，在某些情况下，成功的驱动力，这些公司跨越了道德的界限。因此，这些公司面临许多问题。除非法律得到明确修改，并采取更多的监管措施，否则这些问题将继续在社会中出现。
总结
总之，现代的公司需要有明确、透明和负责任的做法。他们不能专注于销售目标，必须有适当的内部监管机制来解决问题。监管机构的问题在于制定的法律不够明确。这使得跨国公司想方设法规避法律。这些造成了更多的问题和忧虑的态度。在这种模式下，没有可行的解决方案。
因此，语言的明朗化和严格的系统审查本可以阻止富国银行和瑞士信贷的问题。这些公司将意识到为维护道德体系而采取的严格措施，并将遵守法律。在不同方面之间的信息连贯流动本来可以防止这个问题恶化。这是一个类比。
代写网站：丑闻批判分析
From the case studies of these two banks operating in the different nations, it can be eluded that each nation has a regulatory framework with adequate rules. The issues arise in the actual regulatory practices. The variation of the company is found to be regulatory sanctions and enforcement of the laws. There is legal protection that is provided to the regulators to ensure that there is financial integrity of the processes and safety net arrangements by the companies. These are found to address the implementation shortcomings. There are many developments that these regulators undertake to prevent fraudulent practices. However, in spite of these regulators monitoring of these issues, it can be comprehended that the issues are deducted at a later stage. There are systematic monitoring issues and lack in clarity of the rules. Many of the companies look for ways to circumvent the laws and develop their own sales targets. There is a need for a more practical and clear approach for these nations and the laws. The standard setters of the companies have been found to have regulatory standards. There is a difference in the treatment of the similar element in these regulatory boards that make the compliance of the companies more difficult.
These laws continue to be nebulous and cause the people to be circumvented. In this paradigm, the companies are expected to act ethically and in some cases, the drive in to succeeded make, these companies cross the lines of ethics. Owing to this, the companies faced a number of issues. Unless the laws are changed with clarity and more regulatory efforts are taken, these issues will continue to emerge in the society.
Summary
To conclude, the companies in the modern times need to have clear transparent and accountable practices. They must not focus on the sales targets and have appropriate regulatory internal mechanisms to address the issues. The issue with the regulatory bodies is conceiving of laws that are not clear. These make the international companies look for ways to circumvent the laws. These create more issues and apprehensive attitude. In this paradigm, there are no feasible solutions that are derived.
Hence the clarity in language and stringent systematic reviews would have prevented the issues in Well Fargo and Credit Suisse. The companies will be aware of the stringent measures taken to maintain ethical systems and they would adhere to the laws. A cohesive flow of information between the different parties would have prevented this issues from exasperating. These were the analogies that were developed.
