essay代寫：資本主義的探討和會話分析理論
本案例研究的情境情境是在一家普通家庭餐廳。在這家餐廳，五名年齡在20到25歲之間的學生坐在座位上，進行著積極的交流。有關於邁克爾·摩爾紀錄片《資本主義》的討論，一個愛情故事已經在談話中被詳細透露。本案例詳細探討了會話分析和言語行為理論。
根據會話分析的概念，這是一次隨意的會話。在這一交往過程中逐漸形成了輪流模式。由於參與談話的不止兩個人，所以談話並不是兩個人之間的二元交流。它是基於多方分析的。在談話中觀察到人們遵循非語言的暗示。討論的主題是資本主義。人民之間就資本主義問題進行了激烈的討論和交換意見。人們發現，在這次談話中，每個人都很自然地輪流支持或反對資本主義的概念。人們發現這些資本主義的概念引起了激烈的爭論。
在這個故事中，有關於企業主導地位的討論。由於資本主義對社會的影響，美國人民受到了影響。它展示了人們如何面對資本主義的後果。它解釋了人們如何為放棄工作、住房和儲蓄而付出代價。它還展示了由於全球化的影響，普通美國家庭的生活是如何暴露的。它解釋了人們的生活是如何被大公司和政府做出的某些決定所影響的。
語用方面的社會語言技能是在日常生活中與社會其他成員的日常交往中使用的。語用學包括口語、實際內容、內容的社會語境以及內容與情境的關聯性(Kasher, 1998)。語用學整合到交際的許多方面(Cappelen， & Lepore, 2008)。它與社會習俗、語言學家以及社會中人們的意圖是相互聯系的。在這個案例研究中，分析了人們如何看待一個特定的紀錄片。本文在分析的過程中，考慮了紀錄片演講的要素和內容。
在這一分析中，邁克爾·摩爾的電影《資本主義是一個愛情故事》被詳細披露。討論了故事的不同元素以及信息是如何呈現的。這個討論發生在餐廳裏的同伴之間。在這篇分析中，我們將會在觀看紀錄片的同時對這一理論進行回顧、反思和應用。一個是關於真實的紀錄片，另一個是關於觀眾如何看待紀錄片中的信息，以及它如何對人們產生影響。
在案例研究中，所有參與談話的參與者都要確保他們的每一篇談話或講話都符合語法。在這種情況下沒有語言能力的問題。盡管這種語言能力並沒有在這個分析中得到探究，但它被認為是為了確保人們在語法上是健全的。這是同齡人之間的一次隨意交談，正因為如此，他們遵循了所有強制性的社會條件和說話方式的慣例。這是朋友和同齡人之間的一次隨意交談。沒有正式的演講方法。這是朋友間的一次隨意談話。參加對話的人是稱職的，他們遵守所有社會語言和戰略公約的強制性形式。
essay代寫 ：資本主義的探討和會話分析理論
Situational context for this case study is in a causal family restaurant. In this restaurant five students aged from 20 to 25 are seated and engaged in active communication. There is discussion about Micheal Moore documentary Capitalism a love story has been divulged in detail in the conversation. Conversational analysis and the speech act theory have been explored in detail in this case study.
Based on the conversational analysis concept, this was a casual conversation that had taken place. There was turn taking model that was gradually developed in this course of communication. Since it was more than two people involved in the conversation the conversation was not a binary communication between two people. It was based on the multi party analysis. It was observed during this conversation that the people followed the non-verbal cues. The topic of discussion was based on the capitalism. Critical discussions and views about capitalism were exchanged between the people. It was found that in this conversation that the people each took turns naturally to speak for or against the notions of capitalism. These notions of capitalism were found to be a heated debate between the people.
In this story there is discussion of the corporate dominance explained. The people of America have been affected owing to the impact of capitalism in the societies. It shows how people face the consequences of capitalism. It explains how the people pay the price with giving up of jobs, homes and savings of the people. It also shows how the life of the average American family is exposed owing to the impact of globalization. It explains how the people life has been impacted by certain decisions taken by the big corporations and the government.
Pragmatics aspect of the social language skills are used in everyday daily interactions with other members of the society. Pragmatics includes the language spoken, actual content, social context of the content and the relevance of the content to the situation (Kasher, 1998). Pragmatics is integrated to many facets of communication (Cappelen, & Lepore, 2008). It is interlinked to social customs, linguist and how they are intended by the people in the society. In this case study there was analysis of how the people perceived a particular documentary. The elements and contents of the documentary speech were considered in this analysis.
The film “Capitalism a love story” by Micheal Moore has been divulged in detail in this analysis. There is discussion of how the different elements of the story and how the information has been presented. This discussion takes place among peers in a restaurant setting. In this analysis, there will be retrospections, reflections and applications of the theory while viewing a documentary video. One will be on the actual documentary and the other will be as to how the audience perceive the information in the documentary and how it causes an impact to the people.
In the case study all the participants who had been a part of the conversation ensured that each of their discourse or speech was grammatically sound. The issue of language competency was not there in this situation. Even though that language competence has not been probed n this analysis, it has been considered to ensure that the people were grammatically sound. This was a casual conversation among the peers, and owing to this they followed all the mandatory social conditions and conventions of speech patterns. It was a causal speech between friends and peers. There was no formal method of speech that was practiced. It was a casual talk between friends. The people in the conversation were competent and followed all the mandated forms of the socio linguistic and strategic conventions.
