IT作业代写：插头电阻率制作材料的比较分析
电阻率最低的是铝、铜和黄铜，举几个例子。它们通常用于开发插头销。黄金是一种可行的材料，但价格昂贵。铝不适合用作拆卸塞。有必要在铜和黄铜之间作出选择。这取决于材料的强度或韧性。黄铜比铜有更高的强度和更好的电阻。这种黄铜用于制作大头针，因为它满足创建材料所需的所有三个先决条件。黄铜是铜的合金，因此被认为是更可行的。
IT作业代写：插头电阻率制作材料的比较分析
这种材料黄铜被认为是合适的，因为它满足人们的需要。最近几十年来，替代材料也在不断发展。利用可持续材料开发这些塞子有更好的前景。
研究表明，当芯塞采用回收系统或再生系统时，对经济和环境的影响效率在57%左右。当插头被破坏时，这个数字是51%。同样，在使用传统pin材料的旧插头设计中，与在插头中使用改进的pin所带来的77%的可持续性改进增益相比，积极的环境影响是66%。
IT作业代写：插头电阻率制作材料的比较分析
The lowest resistivity is found in aluminium, copper, and brass, to name a few. They are commonly used in the development of the plug pins. Gold is a feasible material but it is expensive. Aluminium is not suitable as a removal plug. There is a need to choose between copper and brass. This is determined based on the strength or toughness of the material. Brass has a higher strength and better resistance than copper. This brass is used to make pins as it meets all the three prerequisites needed for the creation of the material. Brass is an alloy of copper and hence is considered to be more feasible.
IT作业代写：插头电阻率制作材料的比较分析
This material Brass is considered to be appropriate as it meets the needs of the people. There is also the development of alternative materials that are developed in the recent decades. There are the improved prospects of developing these plugs using sustainable materials.
Research studies highlight that when a take-back system or regeneration system is implemented for core plugs, the efficiency in economic and environmental impact is around 57 percent. It is 51 percent when the plugs are destroyed. Similarly, in the old plug design using traditional pin materials, the positive environmental effects are 66 percent compared to the improved gain in sustainability at 77% as presented in the use of improved pins in plugs.
