在纳撒尼尔·科恩的《探索好莱坞》中，对好莱坞究竟发生了什么进行了激烈的讨论，并结合了导演个人经历。在此分析中，对二者的细微差别和社会差异进行了详细的阐述。
在这些叙述中，有对作家或电影制作人所进行的旅行的说明。它们既是时间账户，也是地理账户。他们试图超越人们的主观认知。现代对这种表现形式也有一些批评。近年来，这种自我表现的模式在社会中普遍存在。它已经变得很受欢迎，并已被电影制片人使用。叙事主题也受到社会的欢迎。这种表现形式的真正问题是主体性问题。人们非常重视自己的感受，正因为如此，才有了对情境的主观解读。这就造成了社会的混乱，影响了人们对他们的看法。在一些自动民族志中已经观察到政治化。这造成了社会事实的混乱。汽车民族志不是真实的，也不能被理解为情境的真实，但它们是一种有趣的主观现实主义作品，有着不同的叙事主题。
有人认为，在电影院，这取决于它的表现方式。技术、屏幕游戏和表现方法影响着对汽车民族志的整体感知。对于电影制作者有不同的看法。在这些民族志叙述中，电影制作者使用不同的工具来表达自己。他们需要考虑如何表示信息。
总而言之，自动民族志叙述是对自我和实际事件的看法的混合。它们提供了人们所遇到问题的真实生活描述。表达它们的方式有很多。有效的表达取决于所使用的工具和用于作品创作的技术。这种滞后可能导致对问题的理解出现差异。除此之外，主观现实主义问题也应认真对待。它不应该只是拯救电影制作人在他们童年时所感受到的问题。因此，自动民族志账户是一种表达形式，如果处理得当，它可以成为一个强大的工具。
In Nathaniel Kohn “exploring Hollywood”, there is intense discussion of what actually happens in Hollywood and there is combination of personal experiences encountered by the filmmaker. The nuances and the social discrepancies have been elucidated in detail in this analysis.
In these accounts, there is elucidation of the journeys undertaken by the writer or the film maker. They are both temporal and geographic accounts. They try to transcend people to their subjective perception. There are also some criticisms to this form of expression in the modern times. In the recent time, this mode of self-representation has been ubiquitous in the societies. It has become widely popular and has been used by film makers. The narrative themes are also welcome in the societies. The real issue in this form of expression is the matter of subjectivity. There is a lot of importance given to what the person feels and owing to this there is subjective interpretation of the situation. This causes disruption and influences how they are perceived in the societies. There is politicization that has been observed in some of the auto ethnography. This causes disruption of the facts in the society. Auto ethnographic are not authentic or can they be construed as reality of the situation but they are interesting pieces of subjective realism that has a different narrative theme.
It has been attributed that in cinemas it depends on the way it has been represented. Technology, screen play and the method of representation influences the overall perception of the auto ethnography. There are different views of film makers. In these ethnographic accounts, the film makers use different tools to express themselves. They need to factor in how the information is represented.
To summarize, auto ethnographic accounts are a mixture of the views of the self and actual events. They provide real life accounts of the issues encountered by the people. There are a number of ways in which they are expressed. Effective expression depends on the tools used and the technology used for creation of the work. This lag can cause discrepancies in understanding of the issues. Apart from this, the issue subjective realism should be tackled carefully. It should not be only to salvage the issues felt by the filmmaker in their childhood. Auto ethnographic accounts are thus a form of expression that can be a powerful tool if they are handled carefully.
