商科代写：希罗多德的民主治理辩论
兆字节数敦促寡头政治形式的政府。根据mezos的观点，Otanes的论点是对暴政概念的报复。这个国家的所有人都没有资格当统治者。兆字节意味着普通人无法理解国家的事务。他说，没有受过教育的人不具备管理政府的知识。这可能导致暴民行为反复无常。没有受过教育的乌合之众做出的决定可能会对社会造成危险，但通过选择少数人来做出关键决定，就可以避免这种个人的傲慢。这使得政府能够克服可能的暴政，并拥有高效的政府流程。残暴的统治者最终被取代。决策者的集体知识将有利于政府
Darious同意mb zos的一些观点。我们的祖先所遵循的风俗是君主政体的观念。为了延续君主制的理念，人民给予了很多支持。正确的领导人可以制定有效的政策。因为在寡头政治中，个人恩怨和仇怨会上升。在寡头政治体制下，会产生个人恩怨。政府系统也极有可能建立派系。这种个别成员之间的仇杀将破坏形成健全的政府体系。这种寡头政治制度可能导致分歧，不会有真正的进展。关于民主的各种观点与兆字节佐的观点相似。
从这三个论点中，希罗多德得出结论，只有一个人的统治才能真正提供自由。希罗多德推测了旧寡头政治的影响。旧寡头政治是雅典的一个概念，在这个概念中，在政府的运作中，暴徒被赋予了不适当的发言权。尽管它最初是怀着最好的意图制定的，但实际执行中存在一些问题。希罗多德想要良好的治理、问责制和政府系统的稳定。在向人民讲话时，希罗多德试图向人民解释，所有的观点都得到了考虑。希罗多德试图采取一种公平的制度，并谈到了讨论。从希罗多德的演讲中可以看出，他非常重视和尊重雅典的民主形式。然而，希罗多德指出，在目前的民主形式下，它可能导致制度的失败。因此，他主张人们也应该被允许选择君主政体。许多人对民主和治理决策的概念仍是一个陌生的概念。然而，希罗多德欣赏雅典的民主制度。最后，得出结论，君主政体是最好的政府形式。
总之，希罗多德为现代民主制度铺平了道路。通过对三种治理形式的分析，发现每种治理思想都有其自身的优缺点。人们的结论是，正确的领导人对国家有利。为了确保流程的最大效率，建立了混合治理形式。
商科代写 ：希罗多德的民主治理辩论
Megabyzos urged for oligarchy form of government. According to Megabyzos, Otanes argument was retaliation against the concept of tyranny. All the people in the country are not qualified to be rulers. Megabyzos implies that common man cannot comprehend the affairs of the state. He says that uneducated people do not have the knowledge to run the government. This could lead to mob action that is capricious. Decisions formed by the uneducated mob could be dangerous for the society, but by having a select few people in forming key decisions this individual insolence can be avoided. This enables the government to overcome possible tyranny and have efficient government process. Ruler who is tyrannical is replaced eventually. The collective knowledge of the decision makers will be beneficial for the government
Darious agrees with some views of Megabyzos. Customs followed by our forefather was notions of monarchy. There was a lot of support by the people in order to continue the concepts of monarchy. The right leader can form effective policies. Because in oligarchy there will be rise in personal enmity and vendetta. In oligarchy system, there will be personal enmity created. There is also a strong possibility for setting up of factions by the governmental system. This vendetta by individual members will cause disruptions in forming of robust governmental system. This system of Oligarchy can lead to disagreements and there will be no real progress made. Darious views on democracy were similar to views held by Megabyzos.
From hearing the three arguments, Herodutus concludes that it is only the rule of one man that can truly provide freedom. Herodutus has speculated on the impacts of old oligarchy. Old Oligarchy is an Athenian concept where the mob is given undue voice in running of the government. Even though it was originally framed with best intentions actual implementation has a number of issues. Herodotus wanted good governance, accountability and stability of the governmental systems. While speaking to the people Herodutus tries to explain to the people that all points of view were considered. Herodotus tries to adopt a fair system and speaks about the discussions. It was observed in the speech that Herodutus gives a lot of importance and respect to Athenian form of democracy. However, Herodutus notes that in its current democratic form it could lead to failure of the system. Hence, he claims that people should also be allowed to select the monarchy. Concepts of democracy and governance decision by many people were still an alien concept to the society. Nevertheless, Herodutus appreciated Athenian system of democracy. Finally, it was concluded that monarchy was the best form of government.
In conclusion, Herodutus has paved the way for modern system of democracy. Through all analysis of the three forms of governance, it was found that each of the ideology had its own advantages and disadvantages. It was concluded that the right leader would be beneficial for the state. Mixed form of governance was set up in order to ensure maximum efficiency in the process.
