新西兰代写被抓：有关种族偏见认知的研究分析
作者使用了两个独立变量，其中一个在结果中被操纵，另一个是自然发生的结果，没有操纵。在最后一组250名参与者中，122名黑人和128名白人的偏见条件是明显的、模糊的，而且没有。这三个指标是由评估人员测量的，他们也被分为黑人和白人参与者。
在设计研究和流程时，评估人员使用了这样的问题:“在上次评估中，评估人员(人力资源官)的评论在多大程度上受到了偏见?”这些问题让参与者做出反应，并对施特罗普的表现进行了测量，得出了适当的结果。因变量为美国白人和美国黑人对Stroop表现的反应，采用Stroop颜色命名装置进行测量。
当受试者到达时，研究人员会给他们一份书面描述，描述一个类似于故事的场景，要求他们就招聘决策中的任何可能变化向人力资源部门提供帮助。招聘决定更多地是单独做出的，而不是合作做出的，这是专门针对受试者的。受试者被要求评估公司官员做出的实际或真实的招聘决定。然后，研究对象收到一份关于所提出的雇用建议和可能适用的改变的资料表。为了研究他们的操纵变量，作者在这里使用了一个测试;他们研究了一名3号候选人以及白人和黑人评价者对该候选人做出的决定。这为操作的有效性和接近原始操作提供了符合性测试。
实验设计采用假设和现实两种不同的结果来得出结论。假设的结果与真实的和自然发生的结果一致，漏洞被发现了。此外，研究人员还根据应聘者的简历和认知能力对他们进行了评估。Stroop测试用于评估受试者认知功能的高水平耗竭。黑人受试者由黑人和白人评价者根据三种偏见条件进行评估，白人候选人则根据三种偏见条件进行评估。测试结果使测试和假设更有关联性和可识别性。在偏见的三个条件下，两组被试都表现出不同的反应模式。
图1显示，黑人对模糊的偏见条件反应强烈，这是因为他们无法抓住偏见的根源，因为这是一种归因。没有偏见或明显偏见的受试者数量几乎相等。白人对公然的偏见反应最为强烈，这可能是因为他们在工作中没有经历过偏见。
结果支持提出的假设中的预测。当评估者和被试者都是白人或黑人时，认知耗竭会减弱。当评价者和被试是不同种族时，认知耗竭会恶化。
少数群体已经是一个被污名化的群体，当他们被邀请作为研究对象时，认知障碍会更加严重。他们正经历着像受害者一样的感觉，需要用社会赋予他们的社会污名将他们隔离开来。必须以正确的认知发展目标来保障少数民族。
新西兰代写被抓 ：有关种族偏见认知的研究分析
The authors used two independent variables, out of which one was manipulated in their results, and the other was a naturally occurring result without manipulation. In all the final set of subjects as participants were 250 having 122 Blacks and 128 Whites, the prejudice conditions were blatant, ambiguous, and none. These three were measured by the evaluators who were also divided into Black and White participants.
In designing the research and the process, the evaluators used questions such as, ‘In the last evaluation, to what extent were the comments made by the evaluator (the human-resources officer) prejudiced?’ These questions made the participants to react and the Stroop performance was measured for appropriate results. The dependent variable, namely the White Americans and Black Americans reactions on the Stroop performance was measured using the Stroop colour naming device.
The subjects when arrived were given a written description of the story like scenario where the subjects were requested to help the human resources division about any possible changes in the hiring decisions. The hiring decisions were more done individually and not collaboratively, which was specifically asked to the subjects. The subjects were asked to evaluate the actual or real hiring decisions made by the company officials. The subjects then received a sheet of information about the hiring recommendations made and the possible changes to be applied. The authors, in order to study their manipulated variables, used a test here; they studied a candidate number 3 and the decision given about the candidate by the White and Black evaluator. This provided a conformity test for the manipulation to be valid and close to the original.
The experimental design used assumptions and reality as two different results to come to a conclusion. The assumed results were aligned with the real and naturally occurring ones and the loophole was identified. The candidates were also assessed by their resumes and their cognitive abilities. The Stroop test was used to assess the high level depletion in cognitive functioning of the subjects. The Black subjects were evaluated against the three conditions of prejudice by the Black and White evaluators and vice versa for the White candidates. The results of the test made the test and hypotheses more relatable and recognisable. Both the subject sets showed a varied pattern of reaction during the three condition of prejudice.
Figure one of the article shows that the Blacks are reacting sharply to ambiguous prejudice conditions, and this is because they are not able to catch the origin of the prejudice against them since it is attributional. The number of subjects experiencing no prejudice or blatant prejudice is almost equal. The Whites are most reactive to the blatant prejudice condition, and this could be because of the reason that they have not experienced prejudice at work.
The results support the projections in the hypotheses presented. The cognitive depletion was attenuated when the evaluator and the subject were either White or Black. The cognitive depletion worsened when the evaluator and the subject were of opposite race worsening the situation.
Minority groups are already a stigmatised group of people and when they are invited as subjects the cognitive impairment is more severe. They are experiencing victim like feeling and need to be cured by detaching them with the social stigma given by the society. The minority group must be safeguarded with proper development goals of cognitive development.
