本篇新西兰酒店管理论文代写-合同纠纷案例讲了本报告的目的是评估两宗买卖双方须转让的个案，并仔细了解法院所考虑的因素。本文将讨论两个案例，即Bakhos v . Fenner & Anor(2007)和Urban House v . Purnell Bros(2007)。他们已经和他们的土地达成协议，他们有一个共同点——火灾造成的自然破坏。一宗案件被宣布为重大损害，而另一宗案件的费用由原告承担。本篇新西兰酒店管理论文代写文章由新西兰第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
The purpose of this report is to evaluate two cases subjecting to conveyance between vendor and purchaser and carefully understand the factors that have been regarded by the Courts. Two cases namely Bakhos v Fenner & Anor (2007) and Urban House v Purnell Bros (2007) are to be discussed here. They have had a deal with their land and they have one thing in common – natural damage due to fire. One case has been declared as substantial damage while the other only had the plaintiff to bear the expenses.
Bakhos is the plaintiff and Fenners were the defendants. Fenner and Voglsinger were the joint tenants to the property that had a two bedroom house. At $140,000 as an instalment amount, the property purchase price was set to $1400000 (Austlii, 2007). They enter into a 365-days contract. The sudden fire in the property has let the plaintiff sue against the defendants for justice. There are two issues involved here.
- The compensation to be made by the defendants to the plaintiff towards the damages during fire accident
- Relief on the vendor – purchase contract that has been let loose