新西兰论文代写：平权计划消除了哪些类型的歧视？
为政府机构的女雇员保留职位。由于女性候选人在工作中的保留，她们将能够在一个伟大的环境中工作，在那里她们的才能将得到许多人的认可(Jetten et al .， 2012)。这将有助于消除对妇女的歧视。另一种可以通过积极项目消除的歧视是种族歧视。根据肤色来歧视人的现象由来已久。这是一个非白人被认为是平等的问题(Balafoutas et al, 2012)。他们不得不面对来自白人的反对。种族歧视自古以来就是一个大问题。通过支持这些人获得更好的教育和就业机会，可以消除歧视。(Leslie et al, 2014)。同样，大学录取中的歧视也会通过对他们的预约来实现。
为了给所有人提供平等的机会，已经采取了平权行动。但是，实际上它会导致相反的行为。许多学生表现不错，但由于平权行动计划，他们没能进入大学。一个学生，他一生都在工作，为了得到好的大学和工作，最终因为歧视而不能被录取。
反对平权法案的人认为这项政策是不合理的。它不仅在高等教育和就业等不同领域产生了不公平的待遇，甚至没有惩罚犯罪的人(Goldman, 2015)。实施平权行动的理由是为了弥补某些错误。存在于当今时代的人，并不是过去追随歧视的人。它给属于多数派的人带来了不公平的痛苦。
对于“我是否有权或应该道歉”这个问题的回答
平权法案在世界上面临着很多争论。根据“我是否有权或应该道歉”这一条文，平权行动并没有使其目的受益。相反，它有利于中产阶级、富人和外国出生的人;它使受益人蒙羞，并没有使任何事情更好(蔡，2012)。该条还指出，平权行动的受益者的状况并不好。
这篇文章试图解释平权行动对社会不利。这个问题的答案是，平权行动的确对社会毫无益处，而且无论如何也不会对其所设计的事业作出反应。
新西兰论文代写 ：平权计划消除了哪些类型的歧视？
The reservation of jobs for women employees in government institutions. Because of the reservation for women candidates in job, they will be able to work in a great environment where their talent will be recognized by many (Jetten et al, 2012). This will help to eliminate discrimination against the women. Another discrimination which can be eliminated with the help of affirmative programs is the racial discrimination. Discrimination of the people on the basis of their color has been observed for a long time. It is the problem in which the people who are not white are considered to be equal (Balafoutas et al, 2012). They have to face opposition from whites. Racial discrimination has been a major problem since the historic times. Discrimination can be eliminated by supporting these people to get better access to education and jobs. (Leslie et al, 2014). Similarly, the discrimination in college admission will be done by having reservations for them.
Affirmative actions have been created in order to provide equal opportunities to all the people. But, in reality it leads to opposite actions. Many students perform well but are failing to get into colleges because of the affirmative action programs. A student, who had work had throughout his life in order to get good college and job, can’t get the admission at the end because of discrimination.
Various opponents of affirmative action who states that this policy is not justified. It is something which not only gives birth to unfair treatment in different fields such as higher education and employment, but it even does not punish the people who have done crime (Goldman, 2015). The reasons for implementation of affirmative action are to make up for something which is wrong. The people who exist in present times were not the one who followed discrimination in the past. It leads to an unfair suffering for the people who belong to majorities.
Response to the question ‘Was I entitled or should I apologize”
Affirmative action is something which has faced a lot of argument in the world. According to the article ‘was I entitled or should I apologize’, affirmative actions do not benefit what it is aimed for. Instead, it is beneficial for the people of middle class, wealthy and foreign born people; it stigmatizes its beneficiaries and has not made anything better (Tsai, 2012). The article also states that the beneficiaries of affirmative action are not in the best of their condition.
The article tries to explain that affirmative action is not good for the society. The answer to the question is that it is true that affirmative actions are not useful for the society and in no way, responding to the cause for which they have been designed.
