新西兰论文代写：威尔逊两极化论
威尔逊试图解释当今社会两极分化加剧的三个不同原因。第一个原因是国会政治的变化。为了解释同样的问题，他考虑了1998年克林顿被弹劾时共和党和民主党之间的分歧。在1993年通过的预算中，没有一票来自共和党的最后一票。他指出，自1950年以来，人们观察到，总体投票比例略有上升，导致大多数民主党人反对大多数共和党人(威尔逊，2005)。除此之外，还有大量自由主义保守派和保守主义自由派的消失。现在，只有民主党和共和党这两个对立的党派被排除在外。
他进一步补充说，由于国会内部的分裂，国会的失礼行为大大增加。他试图回忆起国大党互相发表最恶劣言论的时代，以及他们用棍棒和拳头击败对手的时代。
威尔逊提出的另一个论点与大众传媒有关。他说，由于大众传媒的竞争，它们常常引发两极分化的问题。他试图解释，在当时只有很少的电视台和新闻频道，媒体试图增加其在政治中心的重要性(Miller, 2013)。但是，在当今时代，大众传媒已经走向了敌对。他指出，在当今世界，媒体有大量的访问渠道，这反映了争议的最大化。这也导致了利基市场的培育和创造。
两极分化加剧的另一个原因是利益集团试图集中精力处理与物质和经济条件有关的各种问题。他解释说，这些利益集团是围绕包括人权和其他道德问题在内的社会和文化活动而构成自己的群体。早期的一些群体也属于这一群体，他们通过遵循愿意妥协的原则获得了很多优势(Layman et al .， 2006)。然而，这些利益集团在与社会、文化等相关的问题上存在分歧。威尔逊指出，在后现代时代，妥协是一种非常困难的倾向。
为了回答关于两极分化在政治精英之外传播的问题，他提出精英的两极分化可能会根据人们的政治意识水平而下降。他解释说，只要国家的教育水平提高，就会有越来越多的人从政治上了解国家的情况。他指出，具有政治意识的人很可能是受过良好教育、上过中小学和大学的人(Uslaner, 2015)。此外，受过教育的人对从大众媒体上了解政治信息很感兴趣。他们在最近一段时间里意识到这一点，并对不同类型的政治排队持更开放的态度。这是导致不同类型的财富与政治利益分化的另一个因素。
此外，威尔逊还引用了一项研究，该研究表明，在当今时代，人们有不同的投票行为。过去人们的投票方式和企业经理一样，但现在他们试图通过自己的知识来识别。
新西兰论文代写 ：威尔逊两极化论
Wilson has tried to explain three different reasons for the increase of polarization in the present times. The first reason is the changes in the politics of the congress. In order to explain the same, he considers the division between republicans and democrats which was there during the times of impeachment of Clinton in the year 1998. The budget which was passed in the year 1993, did not have any single vote from the end of the republicans. He states that since 1950, it has been observed that there has been a slight increase in the overall percentage of votes which has lead to the majority of democrats against the majority of republicans (Wilson, 2005). Other than this, there has been the elimination of a large number of liberal conservatives and conservative liberals. In the present times only two opposite sides has been left out which are the democrats and the republicans.
He further adds that because of the split within the part there has been a lot of increase in the incivility of the congress. He tries to remind of the times when the congress made the worst kinds of remarks about one another and also beat their rivals by the use of canes and fists.
Another contention which has been provided by Wilson is related to mass media. He states that because of the competitiveness in mass media, they used to ignite the issue of polarization. He tries to explain that in those times when there were a very few television stations and news channels, the media tried to increase its gravity in the political center (Miller, 2013). But, in the present times the mass media has gone towards being adversary. He states that in the present world, media has a large number of lines of access which reflects the maximization of the controversies. This has also led to the cultivation and creation of niche markets.
Another reason for the increase in polarization is because of the interest groups which try to concentrate on the different kinds of issues related to material and economic conditions. He explains that these interest groups are the one who constitute themselves around the social and the cultural activities including the human rights and other moral questions. Some of the early groups who have been the part of the same has gathered a lot of advantage by being in the principle where they are open to compromise (Layman et al, 2006). Though, these interest groups has been divided on the number of issues related to society, culture etc. Wilson states that in the postmodern age, compromise is very difficult tendency.
In order to answer the question related to the spread of polarization beyond the political elites, he gives the argument that the polarization of elites is something that may go down to the people as per their levels of awareness about politics. He explains that whenever there is an increase in the education level in the country, more and more people will be politically aware of the situations in the country. He states that the people who are politically aware may be likely to be the ones who are well-educated and have gone to schools and colleges (Uslaner, 2015). Also, the educated people are interested in hearing about political information from the mass media. They are much more aware in the recent times and are more open to different kinds of political queues. This is another factor which has led to the disaggregation between different kinds of wealth and political interests.
Further, Wilson also cites a study which suggests that the people have different voting behaviors in the present times. The people in the past voted in the same manner like business managers but now they try to identify from their knowledge.
